Model-based Optimization of the Switching Performance of a Switch Disconnector

Authors

  • R. Chechare Eaton India Innovation Center, Pune, Maharashtra 411028, India
  • C. Rümpler Eaton Industries GmbH, 53115 Bonn, Germany https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0313-1976
  • A. Mujawar Eaton India Innovation Center, Pune, Maharashtra 411028, India
  • K. Bednarski Eaton Electrical Products Limited, LE12 5TH Leicestershire, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/ppt.2023.1.40

Keywords:

switch disconnector, arc discharge, arc simulation, model driven development

Abstract

Low voltage switch disconnectors (SD) combine rated load switching with disconnector functionality, providing safe electrical isolation. Electrical contacts are separated forming an arc discharge that needs to be quenched at first current zero (CZ) to protect the load and the SD itself. With increased line voltage, interruption at first CZ crossing is getting more difficult due to increased transient recovery voltage (TRV) and larger post arc current, leading to excessive contact erosion with longer arcing time. Arc simulation methodology was utilized to improve the design for better arc cooling close to CZ. Therefore, benchmark values of arc resistance and thermal time constant were evaluated close to CZ for a successful test at lower line voltage. The cooling efficiency of different designs at higher line voltage was analyzed by 3D arc simulation. A revised design was able to clear overload currents at lower and higher line voltages at first CZ, preventing excessive contact damage.

Author Biography

C. Rümpler, Eaton Industries GmbH, 53115 Bonn, Germany

Chief Technology Engineer

Arc Modling and Simulation CoE

References

Low–voltage switchgear and controlgear – Part 1: General rules. IEC Standard 60947-1, The International Electrotechnical Commission, 2020.

Low–voltage switchgear and controlgear – Part 3: Switch–disconnectors and fuse–combination units. IEC Standard 60947-3, The International Electrotechnical Commission, 2020.

Standard for safety for enclosed and dead-front switches. UL Standard 98, UL Standards & Engagement, 2016.

A. Gleizes, J. J. Gonzalez, and P. Freton. Thermal plasma modelling. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 38(9):R153–R183, April 2005. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/38/9/R01.

C. Rümpler. Lichtbogensimulation für Niederspannungsschaltgeräte. Dissertation, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 2009.

ANSYS ® Fluent. Release 19.2, ANSYS, Inc., 2018.

OCoS. Release 2021, Fraunhofer Institute SCAI, Sankt Augustin. URL: https://www.scai.fraunhofer.de.

C. Rümpler, H. Stammberger, and A. Zacharias. Low–voltage arc simulation with out–gassing polymers. In 2011 IEEE 57th Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (Holm), pages 1–8, Sept 2011. doi:10.1109/HOLM.2011.6034770.

W. Rieder. Plasma und Lichtbogen. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, 1967.

A. Balestrero, L. Ghezzi, M. Popov, et al. Black box modeling of low-voltage circuit breakers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 25(4):2481–2488, 2010. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2047872.

C. Rümpler and V. R. T. Narayanan. Arc modeling challenges. Plasma Physics and Technology, 2(3):261–270, 2015.

K. Hirose. Immobility phenomena of the DC electric arc of large current driven by magnetic field. The Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 80:931–940, 1960.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-08

Issue

Section

Articles