Optical Investigation of a Spark Gap for DC Protection around Current Zero

Authors

  • R. Methling Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 2, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
  • S. Schmausser DEHN SE, Hans-Dehn-Str. 1, 92318 Neumarkt, Germany
  • M. Kellermann DEHN SE, Hans-Dehn-Str. 1, 92318 Neumarkt, Germany
  • A. Ehrhardt DEHN SE, Hans-Dehn-Str. 1, 92318 Neumarkt, Germany
  • S. Gortschakow Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 2, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
  • D. Uhrlandt Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 2, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
  • D. Gonzalez Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 2, 17489 Greifswald, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/ppt.2023.3.154

Keywords:

optical emission spectroscopy, dc protection, spark gap

Abstract

The applied experimental setup consists of a pair of fixed electrodes forming a short gap in air. The electrodes are connected with a thyristor forming a parallel current path. Once the thought flashover ignited arc has burnt a given time in the range of several hundreds of microseconds, the thyristor will be fired causing a commutation of the current in the semiconductor path. Hence, the current through the electrode gap will be reduced. The extinguishment of the arc permits the creation of a current zero in the gap. The focus of the experimental work is set to the analysis of the arc plasma during the DC phase and its distinction in the current extinction phase (current zero). High speed camera observation and optical emission spectroscopy are carried out and combined with the electrical measurements.

References

L. Hüttner, L. Jurčacko, F. Valent, et al. Fundamental analysis of encapsulation of a low-voltage spark gap with deion chamber. In Proc. of 19th Symposium on Physics of Switching Arcs, pages 229–234, 2011.

A. Ehrhardt, S. Schreiter, U. Strangfeld, and M. Rock. Encapsulated lighning current arrester with spark gap and deion chamber. In Proc. of 19th Symposium on Physics of Switching Arcs, pages 165–168, 2011.

D. Bösche, M. Alija, M. Hilbert, and M. Kurrat. Investigation of the recovery behaviour of a small switching gap after current interruption. Plasma Phys. Technol., 4:165–168, 2017. doi:10.14311/ppt.2017.2.165.

T. Kopp, E. Peters, and M. Kurrat. Estimation of current density using high-speed-camera recordings in a model spark gap during surge currents. Plasma Phys. Technol., 6:60–64, 2019. doi:10.14311/ppt.2019.1.60.

G. Lo Piparo, R. Pomponi, T. Kisielewicz, et al. Protection against lightning overvoltages: Approach and tool for surge protective devices selection. Electric Power Systems Research, 188:106531, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106531.

International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62305, ed. 2.0, Protection against lightning. Parts 1-4. IEC, Geneve, Switzerland, 2010-12.

International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60947-3, ed. 3.1, Low-voltage switchgear and controlgear. Part 3: Switches, disconnectors, switch-disconnectors and fuse-combination units. IEC, Geneve, Switzerland, 2012-04.

A. Ehrhardt and S. Schreiter. Dc arc extinguishing principles for spark gap. In Proc. of 20th Symposium on Physics of Switching Arcs, pages 131–134, 2013.

A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and NIST ASD Team. NIST atomic spectra database, version 5.9. URL:physics.nist.gov/asd.

D. Hong, G. Sandolache, J. Bauchire, et al. A new optical technique for investigations of low-voltage circuit breakers. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 33:976–81, 2005. doi:10.1109/TPS.2005.844488.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-20

Issue

Section

Articles