Does a Functional Integral Really Need a Lagrangian?

Authors

  • D. Kochan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/1269

Keywords:

quantization of (non-)Lagrangian systems, path vs. surface functional integral

Abstract

Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics (and also other equivalent formulations) depends on a Lagrangian and/or Hamiltonian function that is chosen to describe the underlying classical system. The arbitrariness presented in this choice leads to a phenomenon called Quantization ambiguity. For example both L1 = ˙q2 and L2 = eq˙ are suitable Lagrangians on a classical level (δL1 = δL2), but quantum mechanically they are diverse.

This paper presents a simple rearrangement of the path integral to a surface functional integral. It is shown that the surface functional integral formulation gives transition probability amplitude which is free of any Lagrangian/Hamiltonian and requires just the underlying classical equations of motion. A simple example examining the functionality of the proposed method is considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-05

How to Cite

Kochan, D. (2010). Does a Functional Integral Really Need a Lagrangian?. Acta Polytechnica, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.14311/1269

Issue

Section

Articles