From Deposit to Point Cloud – a Study of Low-Cost Computer Vision Approaches for the Straightforward Documentation of Archaeological Excavations

Authors

  • M. Doneus Department for Prehistoric and Medieval Archaeology, University of Vienna, Austria LBI for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology, Vienna, Austria
  • G. Verhoeven LBI for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology, Vienna, Austria Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, Belgium,
  • M. Fera Department for Prehistoric and Medieval Archaeology, University of Vienna, Austria VIAS – Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science, University of Vienna, Austria
  • Ch. Briese LBI for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology, Vienna, Austria Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
  • M. Kucera LBI for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology, Vienna, Austria VIAS – Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science, University of Vienna, Austria
  • W. Neubauer LBI for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology, Vienna, Austria VIAS – Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science, University of Vienna, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/gi.6.11

Keywords:

excavation, computer vision, low-cost, 3D single-surface recording, orthophoto

Abstract

Stratigraphic archaeological excavations demand high-resolution documentation techniques for 3D recording. Today, this is typically accomplished using total stations or terrestrial laser scanners. This paper demonstrates the potential of another technique that is low-cost and easy to execute. It takes advantage of software using Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithms, which are known for their ability to reconstruct camera pose and threedimensional scene geometry (rendered as a sparse point cloud) from a series of overlapping photographs captured by a camera moving around the scene. When complemented by stereo matching algorithms, detailed 3D surface models can be built from such relatively oriented photo collections in a fully automated way. The absolute orientation of the model can be derived by the manual measurement of control points. The approach is extremely flexible and appropriate to deal with a wide variety of imagery, because this computer vision approach can also work with imagery resulting from a randomly moving camera (i.e. uncontrolled conditions) and calibrated optics are not a prerequisite. For a few years, these algorithms are embedded in several free and low-cost software packages. This paper will outline how such a program can be applied to map archaeological excavations in a very fast and uncomplicated way, using imagery shot with a standard compact digital camera (even if the ima ges were not taken for this purpose). Archived data from previous excavations of VIAS-University of Vienna has been chosen and the derived digital surface models and orthophotos have been examined for their usefulness for archaeological applications. The a bsolute georeferencing of the resulting surface models was performed with the manual identification of fourteen control points. In order to express the positional accuracy of the generated 3D surface models, the NSSDA guidelines were applied.  Simultaneously acquired terrestrial laser scanning data – which had been processed in our standard workflow – was used to independently check the results. The vertical accuracy of the surface models generated by SfM was found to be within 0.04 m at the 95 % confidence interval, whereas several visual assessments proved a very high horizontal positional accuracy as well.

References

Doneus, M., Neubauer, W.:3D laser scanners on archaeological excavations. In: Dequal S.: (Ed.) Proceedings of the XXth International Symposium CIPA, Torino 2005. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 36-5/C34/1, 2005, 226-231.

Doneus, M., Neubauer, W.: Laser Scanners for 3D Documentation of Stratigraphic Excavations. In: Baltsavias, E.P., Baltsavias, M., Gruen, A., Van Gool, L. & Pateraki, M. (eds.). Recording, Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage. Taylor & Francis, 2006, pp. 193-203.

Neubauer, W.: Laser Scanning and Archaeology – Standard Tool for 3D Documentation of Excavations. GIM international – The global magazine for Geomatics 21 (10), 2007, 14–17.

Ullman, S.:The interpretation of structure from motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 203, 1979, 405-426.

Fisher, R., Dawson-Howe, K., Fitzgibbon, A., Robertson, C., Trucco, E.:Dictionary of Computer Vision and Image Processing. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

Szeliski, R.:Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications. London, Springer, 2010.

Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Snavely, N.:Bundler: Structure from Motion for Unordered Image Collections. http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/bundler,2010-10-28.

Microsoft Corporation:Microsoft Photosynth. http://photosynth.net, 2010-10-28.

Verhoeven, G.:Taking Computer Vision Aloft – Archaeological Three-dimensional Reconstructions from Aerial Photographs with PhotoScan. Archaeological Prospection 18(1), 2011, 67-73.

Scharstein, D., Szeliski, R.:A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms. International Journal of Computer Vision 47, 2002, 7-42.

Seitz, S., Curless, B., Diebel, J., Scharstein, D., Szeliski,R.:A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms. CVPR 2006/1, 519–526.

Pollefeys, M., Van Gool, L.:Visual modelling: from images to images. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 13 (4), 2002, 199–209.

Pollefeys, M., Van Gool, L., Vergauwen, M., Cornelis, K., Verbiest, F., Tops, J.:3D recording for archaeological fieldwork. In IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 23 (3), 2003, 20-27.

Fera, M., Neubauer, W., Doneus, M.:KG Schwarzenbach. Fundberichte aus Österreich 47, 200Ř (200ř), 553-555.

Lowe, D.:Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 (2), 2004, 91–110.

Chen, C., Yue, T.:A method of DEM construction and related error analysis. Computers & Geosciences 36(6), 2010, 717-725.

Federal Geographic Data Committee:Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards. Part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (FGDC-STD-007.3-199). Reston, 1998.

Böhler, W., BordasVicent, M., Marbs, A.:Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy, in: Proceedings of the XIXthe CIPA Symposium, Antalya, Turkey. 30 September-4 October, 2003.

Staiger, R.:The Geometrical Quality of Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS). In: From Pharaohs to Geomatics. FIG Working Week 2005 and GSDI-8. Cairo, Egypt April 16-21, 2005.

Fera, M., Neubauer, W., Doneus, M., Eder-Hinterleitner, A.:Magnetic prospecting and targeted excavation of the prehistoric settlement Platt-Reitlüsse, Austria. Archaeologia Polona 41, 2003, 165-167.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-21

Issue

Section

Articles