Analysis of Appropriate Methods for Assessment of Safety in Aviation

Authors

  • Jana Ondrášková Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Transportation Sciences
  • Jakub Kraus Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Transportation Sciences http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-3507

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/MAD.2014.11.01

Keywords:

safety, aviation safety, assessment of safety, method

Abstract

This article discusses the methods used for the assessment of the safety of aviation. The aim is to introduce the methods, compare them and choose the one that would be most appropriate to use for airlines around the world, and which would therefore bring the biggest increase in the overall safety in aviation.

Author Biographies

Jana Ondrášková, Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Transportation Sciences

Department of Air Transport

Jakub Kraus, Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Transportation Sciences

Department of Air Transport

References

INDICATE. [online] Available at: skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/1133.pdf

EDKINS, G. D., John S. STRONG a C. Kurt ZORN. The INDICATE safety program: evaluation of a method to proactively improve airline safety performance. Safety Science [online]. 1998, vol. 30, issue 3, s. 275-295 [cit. 2014-08-15]. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00049-6. Available at: http://80.www.sciencedirect.com. dialog.cvut.cz/science/article/pii/S0925753598000496

LIOU, James J. H., Gwo-Hshiung TZENG a Han-Chun CHANG. Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model: evaluation of a method to proactively improve airline safety performance. Journal of Air Transport Management [online]. 2007, vol. 13, issue 4, s. 243-249 [cit. 2014-08-15]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.008 Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0969699707000415/1-s2.0-S0969699707000415-main.pdf?_tid=695c1c1a-3665-11e4-9661-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1410077171_1d1eb4bb1c8f3c705806fd1292a571d6

SUPERSTRUCTURE GROUP. Superstructure group AQD. [online] Available at: http://www.superstructuregroup.com/aqd.aspx

ROGAN E. A Practical and Integrated Risk Management Solution, [online] © Superstructure Group Ltd, 2009. Available at: http://www.superstructuregroup.com/ Resources/AQD_Presentation.pps

ARMS WORKING GROUP. The ARMS Methodology for Operational Risk Assessment in Aviation Organisations.[online] ARMS Working Group, 2007-2010. Available at: http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/1141.pdf

ARMS GROUP, ARMS Methodology for Risk Assessment, [online] 2010. Available at: http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/ARMS_Methodology_for_Risk_Assessment

INTELEX.COM, intelex.com. [online] Available at: http://www.intelex.com/Virgin_Atlantic_Airways_Ltd_-C1637client.aspx

ZHANG D., LU M., WU N. A quantitative evaluation method of safety based on argument. [online] China, 2014. Available at: http://jocpr.com/vol6-iss3-2014/JCPR-2014-6-3-645-651.pdf

SAVAGE J. The Risk Analysis Tool at British Airways. [online] British Airways Safety Services, 1998. Available at: http://flightsafety.org/files/analysis_tools.pdf

TAPROOT, About TapRooT® [online] Knoxville, Tennessee, © Copyright 2009 – 2014. Available at: http://www.taproot.com/products-services/about-taproot

CAWBY T. TapRooT© Root Cause Analysis Tool at Alaska Airlines. [online] Alaska Airlines, 2004. Available at: http://flightsafety.org/files/analysis_tools.pdf

Downloads

Published

2014-09-15

Issue

Section

Specialized Articles