Structural reliability of existing rc beams strengthened with UHPFRC tensile layers

Authors

  • Lenganji Simwanda Stellenbosch University, Department of Civil Engineering, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
  • Nico De Koker Stellenbosch University, Department of Civil Engineering, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
  • Celeste Viljoen Stellenbosch University, Department of Civil Engineering, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
  • Adewumi John Babafemi Stellenbosch University, Department of Civil Engineering, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2022.36.0191

Keywords:

corrosion damage, rehabilitation of existing structures, reliability analysis, UHPFRC tensile layers

Abstract

A methodology for reliability analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with ultra high-performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) tensile layers is presented. The proposed methodology includes stochastic stress-block analysis of a section, assuming a perfect bond between the RC beam and the UHPFRC layer. Annual reliability analysis of the RC beam before and after the strengthening operation is conducted. Deterioration induced by chloride corrosion is incorporated into the analysis via a chloride induced corrosion model based on Fick’s law of diffusion and described stochastically to account for the epistemic uncertainty in the time to corrosion initiation and rate of corrosion. A plot for determining the required thickness of the UHPFRC tensile layer to upgrade to the required reliability level is also given, considering the time from construction to when the strengthening operation is conducted. The proposed approach is easy to apply for routine practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-18

How to Cite

Simwanda, L. ., De Koker, N. ., Viljoen, C. ., & Babafemi, A. J. . (2022). Structural reliability of existing rc beams strengthened with UHPFRC tensile layers . Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 36, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2022.36.0191