Comparison of Reconfigurations Using Deterministic Approach for Global Assessment of Operational State in Power System

Authors

  • Boris Cintula Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
  • Žaneta Eleschová Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
  • Anton Beláň Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
  • Peter Janiga Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/TEE.2016.4.104

Abstract

This article deals with the analysis of impact reconfiguration on the power system operational state. The stated analysis assess results of the simulated calculations of N-1 events with the aim to obtain a more complex view of the security criterion N-1 use in comparison with the current methods and procedures being in practice. Methodologies based on the deterministic approach arising from calculations of steady states with the global assessment of the power system operational states are presented. The article objective is to comprehensively compare the selected operational states especially different reconfiguration variants in a power system.

Author Biographies

Boris Cintula, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology,

Institute of Power and Applied Electrical Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Žaneta Eleschová, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology,

Institute of Power and Applied Electrical Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Anton Beláň, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology,

Institute of Power and Applied Electrical Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Peter Janiga, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology,

Institute of Power and Applied Electrical Engineering, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

References

P. Kundur, at al, “Definition and classification of power system stability,” IEEE Transactions on Power System, vol. 19, no. 3, August 2004, pp. 1387 - 1401. [Online]. Available: IEEE Xplore Digital Library, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825981 [Accessed: 25 July. 2016].

J. Machowski, J. W. Bialek, J. R. Bumby, Power System Dynamics: Stability and Control, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, 2008.

Continental Europe Operation Handbook: Operational Security. Brussels - Belgium: ENTSO-E, 2009.

Continental Europe Operation Handbook: Appendix 3: Operational Security. Brussels - Belgium: ENTSO-E, 2009.

Network Code on Operational Security. Brussels - Belgium: ENTSO-E, 2013.

Pravidlá prevádzkovania prenosovej sústavy : Technické podmienky prístupu a pripojenia, pravidlá prevádzkovania prenosovej sústavy. Bratislava: SEPS, a.s., 2014.

Supporting Document for the Network Code on Operational Security, 2nd Edition Final. Brussels - Belgium: ENTSO-E, 2013.

Continental Europe Operation Handbook: Appendix – Policy 5: Emergency Operations: Operational Security. Brussels - Belgium: ENTSO-E, 2010.

B. Cintula, Ž. Eleschová, A. Beláň, “Global assessment of power system operational state after reconfiguration,” Power engineering 2016 - Control of Power Systems, vol. 12, pp. 35-41, May 2016 [12th International scientific conference].

M. Straka, “Rekonfigurácia prenosovej sústavy Slovenskej republiky,” Elektroenergetika, vol. 7, pp. 101-104, Sep 2013 [7th International scientific symposium].

M. Jedinák, S. Prieložný, R. Šmidovič, “Topology Changes in the Transmission System of the Slovak Republic,” Power engineering 2012 - Control of Power Systems, vol. 10, pp. 1-9, May 2012 [10th International scientific conference].

Downloads

Published

2020-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles