Efficient Technique for Model Order Reduction Retaining Non-Minimum Phase Characteristics using Clustering Dominant Pole-Zero Algorithm

Authors

  • Abraham Anuj APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kerala
  • N. Pappa Anna University, Chennai
  • Daniel Honc University of Pardubice, Pardubice

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/TEE.2018.2.026

Abstract

Model Order Reduction (MOR) challenges a high dimensional problem and plays a key role in areas where dynamic simulation studies are necessary for modern simulation strategy. Many conventional reduction methods namely, reduced order models based on Least Square Method (LSM), Balanced Truncation, Hankel Norm reduction, Dominant Pole Algorithm (DPA) and CDPA method have been developed in the field of control theory. Among these, recently proposed Clustering Dominant Pole Algorithm (CDPA) is able to compute the full set of dominant poles and their cluster center efficiently. In this paper, a hybrid algorithm for model order reduction known as Clustering Dominant Pole-Zero Algorithm (CDPZA) is proposed to identify and preserve the dominant zeros of the processes exhibiting non-minimum phase behaviour. The CDPZA method combines the features of clustering method and DPA. Further, the cluster centers of the dominant zeros in the numerator polynomial are determined using factor division algorithm. The Benchmark HiMAT system of 6th order is considered for testing and validation of the proposed algorithm. The simulation studies are carried out to show the efficacy of the proposed algorithm over conventional MOR algorithms.

Author Biographies

Abraham Anuj, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kerala

Department of Applied Electronics & Instrumentation,

Rajagiri School of Engineering & Technology

N. Pappa, Anna University, Chennai

Department of Instrumentation Engineering,

Madras Institute of Technology Campus

Daniel Honc, University of Pardubice, Pardubice

Department of Process Control,

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics

References

S.K. Nagar and S.K. Singh, “An algorithmic approach for system decomposition and balanced realized model reduction,” J. Franklin Inst., 2004, Vol. 341, pp. 615-630.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2004.07.005

M.G. Safonov and R.Y. Chiang, “A Schur Method for Balanced Model Reduction,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., 1989, Vol. 34 (7), pp.729-733. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.29399

David Amsallem, Matthew J. Zahr, and Charbel Farhat, “Nonlinear Model Order Reduction Based on Local Reduced-Order Bases,” Int. J. Numer. Math. Eng., 2012, pp.1-30.

Mihály Petreczky, et al., “Balanced truncation for linear switched systems,” Elsevier, Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid, 2013, Vol. 10, pp. 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2013.03.007

J. Rommes and N. Martins., “Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration,” IEEE Trans. Power System, 2006, Vol. 21 (3), pp. 1218-1226.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876671

Vinod Kumar and J.P. Tiwari, “Order Reducing of Linear System using Clustering Method Factor Division Algorithm,” International Journal of Applied Information Systems, 2012, Vol. 3, No. 5.

S.J. Miller, The Method of Least Squares. Brown Univ., Providence, 2006.

L.A. Aguirre, “Quantitative Measure of Modal Dominance for Continuous Systems,” in Proc. of 32nd Conference on Decision and Control, 1993, pp. 2405-2410.

https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1993.325629

Juergen Hahn and Thomas F. Edgar, “An improved method for nonlinear model reduction using balancing of empirical gramians,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2002, Vol. 26, pp.1379-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00120-5

Huijun Gao, et al., “Hankel norm approximation of linear systems with time-varying delay: continuous and discrete cases,” Int. J. Control, 2004, Vol. 77 (17), pp.1503-1520.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170412331323641

J. Rommes and N. Martins, “Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2008, Vol. 30 (4), pp. 2137-2157.

https://doi.org/10.1137/070684562

Anuj Abraham, N. Pappa, Daniel Honc, and Rahul Sharma, “A hybrid method for determination of effective poles using clustering dominant pole algorithm,” Int. J. of Math., Computational, Natural and Physical Eng., 2015, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 102-106.

G. Parmar, S. Mukherjee, and R. Prasad, “System reduction using factor division algorithm and eigen spectrum analysis,” Int. J. Applied Math. Modeling, 2007, Vol. 31, pp. 2542-2552.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.004

M.G. Safonov, A.J. Laub, and G. Hartmann, “Feedback Properties of Multivariable Systems: The Role and Use of Return Difference Matrix,” IEEE Trans. of Automat. Contr., 1981, AC- Vol. 26 (1), pp. 47-65.

N. Martins, H.J.C.P. Pinto, and L.T.G Lima, “Efficient methods for finding transfer function zeros of power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1992, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 1350-1361.

https://doi.org/10.1109/59.207354

A.C. Antoulas and D.C. Sorensen, “Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems: An overview,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comp. Sci., 2001, Vol. 11 (5), pp.1093-1121.

N. Martins, L.T.G. Lima, and H.J.C.P. Pinto, “Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1996, Vol. 11 (1), pp. 162-170.

https://doi.org/10.1109/59.486093

A.K. Mittal, R. Prasad, and S.P. Sharma, “Reduction of linear dynamic systems using an error minimization technique,” J. Inst. Eng. India IE(I) J. EL, 2004, Vol. 84, pp. 201-206.

A. Abraham, N. Pappa, D. Honc, and R. Sharma, “Reduced order modelling and predictive control of multivariable nonlinear process,” Sādhanā, 2018, Vol. 43 (3), pp. 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0798-x

Downloads

Published

2020-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles