The impact of fire flames on the mechanical characteristics of basalt fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete composed of sustainable components

Authors

  • Ahmed Jasim Oraibi University of Baghdad, College of Engineering, Department of civil Engineering, 10071 Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0279-5578
  • Hadeel Khalid Awad University of Baghdad, College of Engineering, Department of civil Engineering, 10071 Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7132-125X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2025.65.0686

Keywords:

geopolymer concrete, granulated ground blast furnace slag, fly ash, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, basalt fibres

Abstract

The use of geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been proposed to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions linked to the cement production. Fire poses a significant risk to concrete structures, as it causes mechanical degradation of the concrete. This research used 70% Granulated Ground Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and 30 % Fly Ash (FA) to synthesis Geopolymer Concrete (GPC). The alkaline activation solution was created by mixing sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a concentration of 12 molarity. The ratio of the solution to the cementitious material was 0.4. The weight ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide was 2.5:1. Basalt fibres were used for reinforcement at volume fractions of 0.5 %, 0.75 %, and 1 %. The geopolymer concrete specimens were subjected to an elevated temperature of 70 °C in an oven for 4 hours, which is similar to the curing time of 2 days. After 56 days, the specimens were burned at three different temperatures of 300 °C, 500 °C, and 700 °C for one hour. The required tests (compressive strength, flexural strength, splitting tensile strength, and mass loss percentage) were conducted before and after the burning procedure. The residual compressive strength percentages obtained were 90 %, 73 %, and 61 %, the residual flexural strength percentages were 91 %, 70 %, and 51 %, the residual splitting tensile strength percentages were 89 %, 68 %, and 50 %, and the mass loss percentages were 1.271 %, 1.557 %, and 2.035% for a 1% ratio of basalt fibre at 300 °C, 500 °C, and 700 °C, respectively. Geopolymer concrete is highly resistant to flames, even at temperatures of up to 700 °C.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. S. Wong. Durability performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Polymers 14(5):868, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050868

Y. Lin, C. Yang, H. Shi, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of one-part ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering 95:110173, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110173

S. S. Hussein, N. M. Fawzi. Influence of using various percentages of slag on mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Engineering 27(10):50–67, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2021.10.04

R. Sangi, B. S. Sreenivas, K. Shanker. Mix design of fly ash and GGBS based geopolymer concrete activated with water glass. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 13(5):11884–11889, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6216

A. Kumar, Rajkishor, N. Kumar, et al. Effect of ground granulated blast slag and temperature curing on the strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 14(2):13319–13323, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6874

R. Zhao, J. G. Sanjayan. Geopolymer and Portland cement concretes in simulated fire. Magazine of Concrete Research 63(3):163–173, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.9.00110

R. Amar, R. Devanand, H. N. Harsha, K. C. Sachin. Experimental studies on GGBS based geopolymer concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings 2023. [In Press]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.297

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C618-19. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete, 2019.

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E291-09. Standard test methods for chemical analysis of caustic soda and caustic potash (sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide), 2009. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0291-09

Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control. Iraqi standard No. 1703: Water used in concrete, 2018.

Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control. Iraqi standard No. 45: Aggregate from natural sources for concrete and construction, 1984.

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C494/C494M-05. Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0494_C0494M-05

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C192/C192M-19. Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0192_C0192M-19

British Specification Europe numbering. BS EN 12390-3. Testing hardened concrete – Compressive strength of test specimens, 2019.

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E119-00a. Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials scope, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0119-00A

T. Kannangara, M. Guerrieri, S. Fragomeni, P. Joseph. A study of the residual strength of reactive powder-based geopolymer concrete under elevated temperatures. Applied Sciences 11(24):11834, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411834

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C 293-2002. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with center-point loading), 2002.

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C496/C496M-17. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0496_C0496M-17

H. K. Awad. Influence of cooling methods on the behavior of reactive powder concrete exposed to fire flame effect. Fibers 8(3):19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib8030019

H. Hassan Ghanem, H. Khaled Awad. Effect of (LECA) as a partial replacement on some properties of glass fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete exposed to fire flame. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1374(1):012076, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1374/1/012076

R. K. Aboud, H. K. Awad, S. D. Mohammed. Effect of fire exposure on the properties of self-compacting concrete reinforced by glass fibers. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 14(2):13369–13375, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6924

R. Alzeebaree, A. O. Mawlod, D. K. Amen, et al. Fire resistance performance of fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete: Review. E3S Web of Conferences 318:03003, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131803003

O. Mohamed, H. Zuaiter. Fresh properties, strength, and durability of fiber-reinforced geopolymer and conventional concrete: A review. Polymers 16(1):141, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010141

K. S. Natarajan, K. Vellaipandian. Effect of fracture and elastic modulus properties on geopolymer concrete reinforced with basalt fibers for an ecofriendly environment. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 8(5):150, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01103-y

K. M. Klima, K. Schollbach, H. J. H. Brouwers, Q. Yu. Thermal and fire resistance of class F fly ash based geopolymers – A review. Construction and Building Materials 323:126529, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126529

P. M. Robert, I. P. Giannopoulou, P. Savva, et al. New eco-friendly inorganic polymeric materials for the passive fire protection of structures. In TMS 2023 152nd Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings, pp. 758–767. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22524-6_69

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Oraibi, A. J., & Khalid Awad, H. . (2026). The impact of fire flames on the mechanical characteristics of basalt fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete composed of sustainable components. Acta Polytechnica, 65(6), 686–695. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2025.65.0686