MODELING OF MATERIAL BALANCE FROM THE EXPERIMENTAL UCG
Keywords:underground coal gasification, material balance, atoms, ex-situ reactors, losses
The underground coal gasification is a continually evolving technology, which converts coal to calorific gas. There are many important parameters in this technology, which are difficult to measure. These parameters include the underground cavity growth, amount gasified coal, and the leakage of input and output gaseous components into the surrounding layers during the coal gasification process. Mathematical modeling of this process is one of the possible alternatives for determining these unknown parameters. In this paper, the structure of the mathematical model of laboratory underground coal gasification process from the material balance aspect is presented. The material balance consists of mass components entering and leaving from the UCG process. The paper shows a material balance in the form of a general mass balance and atomic species balance. The material balance was testing by six UCG laboratory experiments, which were realized in two ex-situ reactors.
A.W. Bhutto, A.A. Bazmi, G. Zahedi. Underground coal gasification: From fundamentals to applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 39(1):189–214, 2013.
A. Uppal, A.I. Bhatti, E. Aamir, R. Samar, S.A. Khan. Control oriented modeling and optimization of one dimensional packed bed model of underground coal gasification. Journal of Process Control 24(1):269–277, 2014.
J. Kačur, M. Durdán, M. Laciak, P. Flegner. A comparative study of data-driven modeling methods for soft-sensing in underground coal gasification. Acta Polytechnica : journal of advanced engineering 59(4):322–351, 2019.
M. Laciak, K. Kostúr, M. Durdán, J. Kačur, P. Flegner. The analysis of the underground coal gasification in experimental equipment. Energy 114:332–343, 2016.
K. Kostúr, M. Laciak, M. Durdán. Some influences of underground coal gasification on the environment. Sustainability 10(5):1–31, 2018.
E. Škvareková, G. Wittenberger, M. Šofránko. Tar related issues in underground coal gasification. Acta Montanistica Slovaca 21(4):298–305, 2016.
D. Mohanty. An overview of the geological controls in underground coal gasification. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 76(1):1–8, 2017.
F. Su, K.I. Itakura, G. Deguchi, K. Ohga. Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques. Appl Energy 189:142–156, 2017.
G. Perkins. Mathematical modelling of in situ combustion and gasification. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part A: J Power Energy 232(1):56–73, 2018.
A. Verma, B. Olateju, A. Kumar, R. Gupta. Development of a process simulation model for energy analysis of hydrogen production from underground coal
gasification (ucg). Int J Hydrogen Energy 40(34):10705–10719, 2015.
B. Arabi, S.M. Doraisamy, A. Emrouznejad, A. Khoshroo. Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: an application in power plants malmquist luenberger index. Annals of Operations Research 255(1-2):221–239, 2017.
A.V. Spesivtsev, M.L. Dudorova. Multimodel approach to calculating material balances of an enterprise in the medium of intellectual data-measuring systems. Russian Journal of non-ferrous metals 52(2):191–195, 2011.
M.S. Shahamat, C.R. Clarkson. Multiwell, multiphase flowing material balance. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 21(2):445–461, 2018.
M. Zhang, L.F. Ayala. A density-based material balance equation for the analysis of liquid-rich natural gas systems. Journal of petroleum exploration and production technology 6(4):705–718, 2016.
D. Orhan, S. Huseyin. Effect of top sequences on geochemical mass balance and clay mineral formation in soils developed on basalt parent material under subhumid climate condition. Indian journal of Geo-Marine sciences 47(9):1809–1820, 2018.
P.A. Timofeev. Material balance calculation of incineration plant for oily-waste combustion. Marine intellectual technologies 1(3):111–115, 2018.
D. Orozco, R. Aguilera. Material-balance equation for stress-sensitive shale-gas-condensate reservoirs. SPE Reservoir evaluation & engineering 20(1):197–214, 2017.
Y.V. Onishchenko, A.V. Vakhin, B.I Gareev, G.A. Batalin, V.P. Morozov, A.A. Eskin. The material balance of organic matter of domanic shale formation after thermal treatment. Petroleum science and technology 37(7):756–762, 2019.
A. Morris, G. Geiger, H.A. Fine. Handbook on Material and Energy Balance Calculations in Materials Processing. Wiley-TMS 3 edition, 2011.
K. Balu, N. Satyamurthi, S. Ramalingam, B. Deebika. Problems on Material and Energy Balance Calculation. I K International Publishing House, 2009.
N. Ghasem, R. Henda. Principles of Chemical Engineering Processes: Material and Energy Balances, Second Edition. CRC Press, 2014.
Copyright (c) 2020 Milan Durdán, Ján Terpák, Ján Kačur, Marek Laciak, Patrik Flegner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).