A COMPARISON OF TWO MODAL ANALYSIS METHODS: AN IMPACT HAMMER VERSUS LASER VIBROMETRY

Authors

  • Jakub Krejčí Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Department of Control and Instrumentation, Technická 3082/12, Královo Pole, 61600 Brno, Czech Republic
  • Petr Beneš Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Department of Control and Instrumentation, Technická 3082/12, Královo Pole, 61600 Brno, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2020.60.0420

Keywords:

modal analysis, free beam, 2D interferometer, COMSOL, ModalVIEW

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative experimental-analytical study on the performance of Multi-Input Single-Output (MISO) and Single-Input Multi-Output (SIMO) techniques to identify the modal properties of a cantilever beam. A 2-D laser interferometry was employed to perform the SIMO modal test, while for the MISO test configuration, a conventional accelerometer was used to measure the response of the structure. Comparing the experimentally-measured natural frequencies with those calculated by the FEM model, a maximum difference of 4% between natural frequencies was observed. The repeatability of both techniques is also investigated in this paper and it is shown that the difference between modal properties identified under different operators is less than 0.5% for both the MISO and SIMO techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zarbaf, S. E. H. A. M., Allemang, R.: A Modification to Unified Matrix Polynomial Approach (UMPA) for Modal Parameter Identification, Structural Health Monitoring, Photogrammetry & DIC, Volume 6, 2019, pp. 1-8, ISBN 978-3-319-74476-6 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74476-6_1

Allemang, R. J., Brown, D. L.: A unified matrix polynomial approach to modal identification, Journal of Sound and Vibration 211, No. 3, 1998, pp. 301-322, ISSN 0022-460X, doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1321

Silva, J. M. M., Maia, N. M. M.: Modal Analysis and Testing, Springer Netherlands (1999).

He, J., Fu, Z.-F.: Modal Analysis, Butterworth-Heinemann (2001), ISBN 978-0-7506-5079-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-5079-3.X5000-1

He, D., Guo, Y.: Finite element analysis of humanoid robot arm, 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), Xi'an, 2016, pp. 772-776,

doi: 10.1109/URAI.2016.7733979

Imran, M., Abbasi, A. A., Hyder, M. J.: Determination of modal characteristics of cantilever beam, 2016 International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), Islamabad, 2016, pp. 1-3.

doi: 10.1109/ICET.2016.7813224

Zheng, B., Zhang, J., Yao, Y.: Finite Element Analysis of the Piston Based on ANSYS, 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), Chengdu, China, 2019, pp. 1908-1911.

doi: 10.1109/ITNEC.2019.8729409

Qi, S.: Modal Test Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Simply Supported Beam Bridge, 2018 International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System (ICRIS), Changsha, 2018, pp. 86-89.

doi: 10.1109/ICRIS.2018.00030

Orlowitz, E., Brandt, A.: Comparison of experimental and operational modal analysis on a laboratory test plate, Measurement, Volume 102, 2017, pp. 121-130, ISSN 0263-2241, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.001.

V. Ondra, B. Titurus, Theoretical and experimental modal analysis of a beam-tendon system, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Volume 132, 2019, Pages 55-71, ISSN 0888-3270, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.016.

Avcar, M.: Free vibration analysis of beams considering different geometric characteristics and boundary conditions, Int. J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 4 No. 3, 2014, pp. 94-100, ISSN: 2165-9303, doi:10.5923/j.mechanics.20140403.03.

Meirovitch, L.: Fundamentals of Vibrations, McGraw-Hill (2001), ISBN 0-07-118174-1.

Donnell L. H.: Beams Plates and Shells, Engineering Societies Monographs McGrawHill (1976).

Downloads

Published

2020-11-02

Issue

Section

Articles