Water-air ejector with conical-cylindrical mixing chamber


  • Andrii Sliusenko National University of Food Technologies, Educational and Scientific Institute of Technical Engineering by name of academician I.S. Hulyi, Department of Technological Equipment and Computer Technology Design, Volodymyrska 68, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9118-8787
  • Vitalii Ponomarenko National University of Food Technologies, Educational and Scientific Institute of Technical Engineering by name of academician I.S. Hulyi, Department of Technological Equipment and Computer Technology Design, Volodymyrska 68, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0732-4783
  • Inna Forostiuk National University of Food Technologies, Department of Foreign Languages for Professional Purposes, Volodymyrska 68, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8691-3203




ejector, mixing chamber, spatial position, reverse-circulation flows


In the paper, the hydrodynamics of the liquid-gas mixture in the mixing chamber of the ejectors at different spatial positions was analyzed and the comparative study of such ejectors was carried out. It was found that a more ordered mode of movement of the mixture in the mixing chamber is created as a result of the coincidence of the velocity vector of liquid drops and the direction of gravity in the vertical position of the ejectors. This leads to increasing the volume entrainment ratio almost twice. The analysis of the liquid-gas mixture flow in the mixing chamber, evaluation calculations and research allowed to develop and to patent a jet apparatus with a conical-cylindrical (combined) mixing chamber. It was also found that for such ejectors, the volume entrainment ratio is 15–55% higher than for a jet apparatus with a cylindrical mixing chamber due to the reduction of the resistance of the passive flow into the mixing chamber and prevention of the formation of reverse-circulating flows. A study has been conducted on liquid-gas ejectors in the range of the main geometric parameter m (ratio of the mixing chamber area to the nozzle area) 9.4–126.5, which allowed to establish its rational values at which the maximum volume entrainment ratio is achieved (m = 25–40).


Download data is not yet available.


J. Wang, H. Cheng, S. Xu, et al. Performance of cavitation flow and its induced noise of different jet pump cavitation reactors. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 55:322–331, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016j.ultsonch.2019.01.011.

Y. P. Kabanov, G. V. Shevchenko. K voprosu opredeleniya kavitatsionnyih harakteristik struynyih nasosov. Chelyabinskiy fiziko-matematicheskiy zhurnal 1(2):94–99, 2016.

F. Kong, H. D. Kim. Analytical and computational studies on the performance of a two-stage ejector–diffuser system. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 85:71–87, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.117.

G. Besagni, R. Mereu, F. Inzoli, et al. Application of an integrated lumped parameter-CFD approach to evaluate the ejector-driven anode recirculation in a PEM fuel cell system. Applied Thermal Engineering 121:628–651, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.111.

Z. Aidoun, K. Ameur, M. Falsafioon, et al. Current advances in ejector modeling, experimentation and applications for refrigeration and heat pumps. Part 2: Two-phase ejectors. Inventions 4(1):16, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions4010016.

A. Shah, I. R. Chughtai, M. H. Inayat. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of mixing section length on direct-contact condensation in steam jet pump. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 72:430–439, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.01.032.

X. Yang, X. Long, X. Yao. Numerical investigation on the mixing process in a steam ejector with different nozzle structures. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 56:95–106, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.01.021.

B. Kitrattana, S. Aphornratana, T. Thongtip, et al. Comparison of traditional and CRMC ejector performance used in a steam ejector refrigeration. Energy Procedia 138:476–481, 2017. https://doi.org10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.229.

B. M. Tashtoush, M. A. Al-Nimr, M. A. Khasawneh. A comprehensive review of ejector design, performance, and applications. Applied Energy 240:138–172, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016j.apenergy.2019.01.185.

Y. V. Martynenko, V. I. Bolobov, V. A. Voronov. Use of liquid-gas ejector in liquefied natural gas (LNG) sampling system. E3S Web of Conferences 266:01006, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf202126601006.

S. Shen, X. Qu, B. Zhang, et al. Study of a gas–liquid ejector and its application to a solar-powered bi-ejector refrigeration system. Applied Thermal Engineering 25(17-18):2891–2902, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.02.012.

S. Riffat, L. Jiang, G. Gan. Recent development in ejector technology – a review. International Journal of Ambient Energ 26(1):13–26, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2005.9674967.

K. Samoichuk, J. Poludnenko, N. Palyanichka, et al. Experimental investigations of sugar concentration for counterflow jet mixing of drinks. Technology audit and production reserves 2(3(34)):41–46, 2017. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100173.

A. I. Sokolenko. Intensifikatsiya teplo-masoobminnih protsesiv v harchovih tehnologiyah. Feniks, Kyiv, 2011.

V. Ponomarenko, N. Pushanko. Ejection devices in mass transfer processes of sugar industry. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken, 2014.

S. Akteriana. Improving the energy efficiency of traditional multi-stage steam-jet-ejector vacuum systems for deodorizing edible oils. Procedia Food Science 1:1785–1791, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016j.profoo.2011.09.262.

M. T. Kandakure, V. G. Gaikar, A. W. Patwardhan. Hydrodynamic aspects of ejectors. Chemical Engineering Science 60(22):6391–6402, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.055.

E. Y. Sokolov, N. M. Zinger. Struynyie apparatyi. Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1989.

A. F. Yatsenko, T. A. Ustimenko. Teoreticheskie i eksperimentalnyie issledovaniya vodovozdushnogo ezhektora. Naukovi pratsi Donetskogo natsionalnogo tehnichnogo universitetu 23(196):247–253, 2012. http://ea.donntu.org/handle/123456789/11573.

Y. Tang, Z. Liu, Y. Li, et al. Visualization experimental study of the condensing flow regime in the transonic mixing process of desalination-oriented steam ejector. Energy Conversion and Management 197:111849, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111849.

Y. Han, X. Wang, H. Sun, et al. CFD simulation on the boundary layer separation in the steam ejector and its influence on the pumping performance. Energy 167:469–483, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016j.energy.2018.10.195.

R. Bi, M. Hu, S. Wang, et al. Effect of throat length on steam ejector critical back pressure. Chemical Engineering Transactions 61:1945–1950, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1761322.

S. Gül, Z. S. Özdogan. Ejector type solid circulation system analysis for circulating fluidized beds. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 84:116–128, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.04.020.

S. Y. Smyk, A. G. Butenko. Modelling of work central ejectors with the purpose of increase of their efficiency. Modern Science: Researches, Ideas, Results, Technologies 1(3):150–152, 2010. http://modern.science.triacon.org/en/issues/2010/files/2010_1(3)_23.htm.

V. Ponomarenko, N. Pushanko. Sprays fluid: an effective way to intensify the processes in the food industry. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken, 2015.

DSTU ISO 286-1-2002. ISO tolerances and fits. Standart, State committee of Ukraine for technical regulation and consumer policy. Kyiv, 2003.

V. Ponomarenko, T. Dimitrov, A. Sliusenko, et al. Liquid jet gas ejectors: designs of motive nozzles, performance efficiency. Proceedings of university of Ruse 58(10.1):91–95, 2019.

A. A. Aleksandrov, B. A. Grigoryev. Tablitsy teplofizicheskikh svoystv vody i vodyanogo para. Moskovskiy energeticheskiy institute, Moscow, 1999.

I. E. Idelchik. Spravochnik po gidravlicheskim soprotivleniyam. Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1992.

V. V. Ponomarenko, A. M. Sliusenko. Liquid-gas ejector, 2020. Ukraine patent UA 122296 C2.