Loss of particle ratio metric for particle image velocimetry accuracy estimation

Authors

  • Jan Novotný Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Pasteurova 3334/7, 400 01 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
  • Ludmila Nováková Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Pasteurova 3334/7, 400 01 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
  • Ilona Machovská Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Pasteurova 3334/7, 400 01 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
  • Miloš Kašpárek Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Pasteurova 3334/7, 400 01 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2025.65.0420

Keywords:

particle image velocimetry, accuracy, metric, synthetic tests, uncertainty

Abstract

This paper presents an algorithm for evaluating measurement uncertainty at individual points within the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) method. The algorithm presents a novel correlation plane metric known as the Loss of Particle Ratio (LPR). This metric is computed by evaluating the magnitude of two correlation peaks: Mutual Information (MI) and the autocorrelation peak. LPR is defined as the ratio of MI, accounting for the total number of particles contributing to signal peak growth, to the magnitude of the autocorrelation peak, which represents the total number of particles within an interrogation area (IA). The computation of LPR allows both the overall measurement accuracy and the accuracy in each direction to be determined. To improve accuracy, the proposed metric undergoes corrections based on the resultant displacement from the last iteration of the Standard Cross-Correlation (SCC) algorithm and the gradient value within the IA. The process of determining the measurement uncertainty relies on the analysis of synthetic data and the application of two tests – the Uniform Flow Test (UFT) and the Couette Flow Test (CFT). The paper explores the impact of individual corrections on the metric and establishes dependencies between the adjusted metric values and measurement uncertainty. The procedure defines the measurement uncertainty based on synthetic test parameterisation, considering key parameters that influence accuracy, such as the density of particles within the IA, the velocity gradient, the particle diameter, the displacement in the last iteration, and the noise level. The synthetic test parametrisation employs various methods for defining the gradient within the IA. The proposed procedure for determining the measurement uncertainty, utilising the corrected metric Loss of Particle Ratio, is compared with an approach based on synthetic test parameterisation for the Standard Cross-Correlation algorithm. The study contributes insights into the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in assessing measurement uncertainty, offering a comprehensive comparison with existing methodologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. D. Keane, R. J. Adrian. Optimization of particle image velocimeters. I. Double pulsed systems. Measurement Science and Technology 1(11):1202, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/1/11/013

K. Okamoto, S. Nishio, T. Saga, T. Kobayashi. Standard images for particle-image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology 11(6):685, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/311

J. Westerweel. Digital particle image velocimetry: Theory and application. Delft University Press, 1993.

F. Scarano, M. L. Riethmuller. Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing. Experiments in Fluids 29(1):S051–S060, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480070007

B. H. Timmins, B. W. Wilson, B. L. Smith, P. P. Vlachos. A method for automatic estimation of instantaneous local uncertainty in particle image velocimetry measurements. Experiments in Fluids 53(4):1133–1147, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1341-1

M. Raffel, C. E. Willert, S. T. Wereley, J. Kompenhans. Particle image velocimetry: A practical guide. Springer Verlag, Germany, 2nd edn., 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72308-0

A. Sciacchitano. Uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology 30(9):092001, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab1db8

A. Sciacchitano, D. R. Neal, B. L. Smith, et al. Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods. Measurement Science and Technology 26(7):074004, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074004

A. Sciacchitano, B. Wieneke, F. Scarano. PIV uncertainty quantification by image matching. Measurement Science and Technology 24(4):045302, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/4/045302

B. Wieneke. PIV uncertainty quantification from correlation statistics. Measurement Science and Technology 26(7):074002, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074002

A. Boomsma, S. Bhattacharya, D. Troolin, et al. A comparative experimental evaluation of uncertainty estimation methods for two-component PIV. Measurement Science and Technology 27(9):094006, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/9/094006

Z. Xue, J. J. Charonko, P. P. Vlachos. Signal-to-noise ratio, error and uncertainty of PIV measurement. In International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry. 2013.

Z. Xue, J. J. Charonko, P. P. Vlachos. Particle image velocimetry correlation signal-to-noise ratio metrics and measurement uncertainty quantification. Measurement Science and Technology 25(11):115301, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/11/115301

Z. Xue, J. J. Charonko, P. P. Vlachos. Particle image pattern mutual information and uncertainty estimation for particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology 26(7):074001, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074001

I. Tirelli, A. Ianiro, S. Discetti. A simple trick to improve the accuracy of PIV/PTV data. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 145:110872, 2023. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.110872

M. Maceas, A. F. Osorio, F. Bolanos. A methodology for improving both performance and measurement errors in PIV. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 77:101846, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101846

S. Blahout, S. R. Reinecke, H. Kruggel-Emden, J. Hussong. On the micro-PIV accuracy and reliability utilizing non-Gaussian particle images. Experiments in Fluids 62(9):191, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03283-8

J. Novotny, I. Machovska. Corrected metric for uncertainty estimation methods in particle image velocimetry. In 9th World Conference on Experimental Heat Transfer, Fluid mechanics and Thermodynamics. 2017.

J. Novotny, I. Machovska. Primary peak ratio correlation to the measurement accuracy of PIV method. Acta Polytechnica 58(3):189–194, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2018.58.0189

J. Novotny, L. Novakova, I. Machovska. Advanced metric for particle image velocimetry accuracy estimation. In 19th International Symposium on Applications of Laser and Imaging Techniques to Fluid Mechanics (Lisbon, Portugal). 2018.

J. Westerweel. Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology 8(12):1379, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/002

J. Westerweel. Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 29(1):S003–S012, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480070002

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Novotný, J., Nováková, L., Machovská, I., & Kašpárek, M. (2025). Loss of particle ratio metric for particle image velocimetry accuracy estimation. Acta Polytechnica, 65(4), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2025.65.0420