The satellite SMILE – its prospects for observing cosmic sources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2025.65.0110Keywords:
astronomical instrumentation, methods and techniques, observational methods, X-ray binaries, radiation mechanismsAbstract
We describe the scientific potential of a Soft X-ray Imager (SXI) onboard the ESA–CAS satellite SMILE to study the activity of cosmic X-ray sources in the soft X-ray region and located in the fields planned to be observed by SXI. We used the 2–3 keV band flux of the monitor MAXI/ISS, covering at least part of the expected band of the SXI/SMILE telescope. We discuss how SXI can contribute to this branch and how combining the SXI/SMILE data with those obtained by other satellites on the same days can be helpful if the light curves of the 1-day means are used. We show these possibilities on several examples of cosmic X-ray sources (Vela X-1 and GROJ1008-57 containing neutron stars accreting matter from their companions) in the field of view of SXI. Including observations from MAXI/ISS and BAT/Swift will enable extending the coverage to the energy of 50 keV.
Downloads
References
G. Branduardi-Raymont, S. Sembay, T. Sun, et al. Imaging the Earth’s magnetic environment in soft X-rays with SMILE. In EGU General Assembly, p. 10877. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10877
G. Branduardi-Raymont, C. Wang, C. P. Escoubet, et al. The SMILE mission: Global imaging of solar-terrestrial interactions. In AGU Fall Meeting, vol. 2022, pp. SM33B–01. 2022.
S. Sembay, G. Branduardi-Raymont, P. Drumm, et al. The Soft X-ray Imager (SXI) on the SMILE Mission. In AGU Fall Meeting, pp. SM44A–04. 2016.
W. H. G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, E. P. van den Heuvel. X-ray binaries. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
M. Matsuoka, K. Kawasaki, S. Ueno, et al. The MAXI mission on the ISS: Science and instruments for monitoring all-sky X-Ray images. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 61(5):999–1010, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/61.5.999
V. Šimon, R. Hudec, A. Read. Soft X-ray observing the cosmic sources by the ESA-CAS satellite SMILE. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 41:97–105, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.02.005
RIKEN, JAXA, MAXI team. Light curves. [2024-06-18]. http://maxi.riken.jp/top/lc.html
RIKEN, JAXA, MAXI team. MAXI on-demand process, 2011. [2024-06-18]. http://maxi.riken.jp/mxondem/
S. D. Barthelmy, L. M. Barbier, J. R. Cummings, et al. The burst alert telescope (BAT) on the Swift MIDEX mission. Space Science Reviews 120(3):143–164, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3
H. A. Krimm, S. T. Holland, R. H. D. Corbet, et al. The Swift/BAT hard X-ray transient monitor. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 209(1):14, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14
Neil Gehrels Swift observatory. Swift/BAT hard X-ray transient monitor, 2025. [2024-06-18]. https://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/transients/
Neil Gehrels Swift observatory. Swift’s burst alert telescope (BAT), 2012. [2024-06-18]. https://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/about_swift/bat_desc.html
K. Asai, M. Matsuoka, T. Mihara, et al. Slow and fast transitions in the rising phase of outbursts from NS-LMXB transients, Aquila X-1 and 4U 1608-52. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 64(6):128, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/64.6.128
V. Šimon. X-ray outbursts and high-state episodes of HETE J1900.1-2455. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477(1):67–73, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty575
J. E. McClintock, S. Rappaport, P. C. Joss, et al. Discovery of a 283-second periodic variation in the X-ray source 3U 0900-40. The Astrophysical Journal 206:L99–L102, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1086/182142
M. H. van Kerkwijk, J. van Paradijs, E. J. Zuiderwijk, et al. Spectroscopy of HD77581 and the mass of VELA X-1. Astronomy & Astrophysics 303:483, 1995. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9505070
M. Falanga, E. Bozzo, A. Lutovinov, et al. Ephemeris, orbital decay, and masses of ten eclipsing high-mass X-ray binaries. Astronomy & Astrophysics 577:A130, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425191
P. Kretschmar, I. El Mellah, S. Martínez-Núñez, et al. Revisiting the archetypical wind accretor Vela X-1 in depth. Case study of a well-known X-ray binary and the limits of our knowledge. Astronomy & Astrophysics 652:A95, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040272
M. J. Coe, P. Roche, C. Everall, et al. Discovery of the optical counterpart to the CGRO transient GRO J1008-57. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 270(1):L57–L61, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/270.1.L57
M. T. Stollberg, M. H. Finger, R. B. Wilson, et al. GRO J1008-57. IAUC p. 5836, 1993.
A. M. Levine, R. Corbet. Detection of additional periodicities in RXTE ASM light curves. The Astronomer’s Telegram 940, 2006. [2024-06-18]. https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=940
M. J. Coe, A. J. Bird, A. B. Hill, et al. Now you see it, now you don’t – the circumstellar disc in the GRO J1008-57. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 378(4):1427–1433, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11878.x
M. Kühnel, S. Müller, I. Kreykenbohm, et al. GRO J1008-57: An (almost) predictable transient X-ray binary. Astronomy & Astrophysics 555:A95, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321203
P. Reig. Be/X-ray binaries. Astrophysics and Space Science 332(1):1–29, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-010-0575-8
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vojtěch Šimon, René Hudec, Andrew Read
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
