Tensile Analysis of Steel Mesh reinforced Polymer Concrete Material (SMPC)

Authors

  • Jianwei Li Henan University
  • Wentao Xu Henan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2026.02.0011

Keywords:

Steel wire mesh - polyurethane concrete (SWM-PUC) composite material, Axial tensile properties, Constitutive relation, Failure mode

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel bridge reinforcement method—steel mesh reinforced polymer concrete (SMPC)—building upon the mature steel mesh reinforced polymer mortar (SMPM) technology. By leveraging the superior corrosion resistance and tensile properties of steel mesh, combined with the strong adhesion and rapid curing characteristics of polymer concrete, this composite material system offers significant advantages in bridge reinforcement applications, including reduced construction time and lower project costs. To validate the feasibility of this method, uniaxial tensile tests were conducted on SMPC dumbbell specimens. The experimental investigation examined key variables affecting tensile performance, including specimen width, thickness, resin-to-powder ratio, and curing time. Based on the obtained stress-strain relationships under different test conditions, a constitutive model for SMPM under uniaxial tension was established. The tensile strength demonstrates a marked improvement from 45.1 MPa (1-layer specimen) to 51.3 MPa (4-layer specimen). Notably, variations in specimen width and steel strand reinforcement ratio exhibit minimal impact on the ultimate tensile strain of SMPC. Regarding adhesive-to-powder ratio effects, specimens with a 0.8:1 ratio demonstrate superior tensile strength compared to those with a 1:0.8 ratio. At equivalent steel mesh layers, the 0.8:1 ratio group achieves 53.2 MPa, representing an 18.5% enhancement over the 44.9 MPa observed in the 1:0.8 ratio group. The results demonstrate that SMPC exhibits excellent early-strength properties, where increasing the resin-to-powder ratio enhances material ductility, while higher reinforcement ratios improve the composite's tensile strength.

Received:                                         15.08.2024

Received in revised form:              14.05.2026

Accepted:                                        19.05.2026

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cadenazzi T, Dotelli G, Rossini M, et al. Cost and environmental analyses of reinforcement alternatives for a concrete bridge[J]. Structure and infrastructure engineering, 2020, 16(4): 787-802.

Su J, Wang J, Li Z, et al. Effect of reinforcement grade and concrete strength on seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge piers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 198: 109512.

Heitner B, OBrien E J, Yalamas T, et al. Updating probabilities of bridge reinforcement corrosion using health monitoring data[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 190: 41-51.

Berg A C, Bank L C, Oliva M G, et al. Construction and cost analysis of an FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2006, 20(8): 515-526.

El-Gamal S, El-Salakawy E, Benmokrane B. Influence of reinforcement on the behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2007, 11(5): 449-458.

Raiyani S D, Patel P V, Vora S D. Effectiveness of stainless steel wire mesh in shear strengthening of reinforced concrete flanged beam[J]. International Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 10(3): 195-216.

Eamon C D, Jensen E A, Grace N F, et al. Life-cycle cost analysis of alternative reinforcement materials for bridge superstructures considering cost and maintenance uncertainties[J]. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2012, 24(4): 373-380.

Wang C, Wang H, Shankar K, et al. On the mechanical behaviour of steel wire mesh subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 159: 107281.

Al Saadi H S M, Mohandas H P, Namasivayam A. An experimental study on strengthening of reinforced concrete flexural members using steel wire mesh[J]. Curved and layered structures, 2017, 4(1): 31-37.

Xing G, Wu T, Liu B, et al. Experimental investigation of reinforced concrete T-beams strengthened with steel wire mesh embedded in polymer mortar overlay[J]. Advances in structural Engineering, 2010, 13(1): 69-79.

Zhao H. Axial compressive behaviour of concrete strengthened with steel rings, wire mesh and modified high strength mortar (MHSM)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 250: 118938.

Li K, Wei Y, Li Y, et al. Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with high-strength stainless steel wire rope meshes reinforced ECC[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 362: 129627.

Ezz-Eldeen H A. An experimental study on strengthening and retrofitting of damaged reinforced concrete beams using steel wire mesh and steel angles[J]. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2015, 4(5): 164-173.

Hussain H K, Liu G W, Yong Y W. Experimental study to investigate mechanical properties of new material polyurethane–cement composite (PUC)[J]. Construction and Building materials, 2014, 50: 200-208.

Li C, Zhang W, Sun G, et al. Research on damping properties and microscopic mechanism of polyurethane cement-based composites[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 365: 130137.

Sadowski Ł, Hoła J, Żak A, et al. Microstructural and mechanical assessment of the causes of failure of floors made of polyurethane-cement composites[J]. Composite structures, 2020, 238: 112002.

Kexin Z, Quansheng S. Strengthening of a reinforced concrete bridge with polyurethane-cement composite (PUC)[J]. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 10(1).

Al-kahtani M S M, Zhu H, Ibrahim Y E, et al. Experimental study on the strength and durability-related properties of ordinary Portland and rapid hardening Portland cement mortar containing polyurethane binder[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 17: e01530.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tensile Analysis of Steel Mesh reinforced Polymer Concrete Material (SMPC). (2026). Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 35(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2026.02.0011