Bonding procedures, artificial ageing and their effect on the durability of glass-to-glass adhesive joints

Authors

  • Markéta Zikmundová Faculty of Civil Engineeering, Czech Technical University in Prague
  • Martina Eliášová Faculty of Civil Engineering, CTU in Prague
  • Klára V. Machalická Klokner Institute, CTU in Prague

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2026.01.0006

Keywords:

Transparent adhesives, Glass, Bonded joints, Artificial ageing, Double-lap shear joint, Epoxy adhesive, Acrylate adhesive

Abstract

In the context of modern architecture, glass is widely regarded as a fundamental design element, representing a material of increasing interest to architects and engineers. The fundamental challenge in using glass is design convenient connections. Adhesive joints are more convenient connections compared to mechanical fixings due to ensuring uniform stress distribution. This study focuses on small glass-to-glass specimens: (i) bonding of the specimens, (ii) artificial ageing, and (iii) shear tests. Two different transparent adhesives were tested, 2-component epoxy and UV-cured acrylate.

Proper specimen bonding is essential. Two-component epoxy required careful sealing during curing to prevent leakage. The UV-cured acrylate adhesive needed careful curing process to avoid bubble formation due to shrinkage of the adhesive. To determine resistance to environmental effects, combination of DVS 1618 procedure and UV radiation was used for artificial ageing of specimens. Shear tests on the reference set showed excellent results for acrylate adhesive, which achieved an average shear strength of 10.17 MPa. Problems with adhesion appeared after artificial ageing. Epoxy adhesive achieved an average shear strength of 4.55 MPa in the reference set. Two specimens had problems with adhesion to glass. After ageing, the specimens achieved a higher average shear strength (4.86 MPa) than in the reference set. The aged specimens failed only by glass breakage. Both adhesives showed high potential for use in glass construction joints.

Received:                                       30.11.2025
Received in revised form:           15.03.2026
Accepted:                                       23.04.2026

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bedon Ch., Santarsiero M., 2018. Transparency in Structural Glass Systems Via Mechanical, Adhesive, and Laminated Connections - Existing Research and Developments. Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 20, no. 5, 18 pp. ISSN 1438-1656, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700815

Lavko M., Kvočák V., 2020. Comparison of Mechanical and Adhesive Joints for Structural Glass – A review. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 867, no. 1. ISSN 1757-8981, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/867/1/012027

Oikonomopoulou F., Veer F., Nijsse R., Baardolf K., 2015. A completely transparent, adhesively bonded soda-lime glass block masonry system. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, vol. 2, No. 3-4, pp. 201-221. ISSN 2213-302X, https://doi.org/10.3233/fde-150021

Oikonomopoulou F., Bristogianni T., 2022. Adhesive solutions for cast glass assemblies: ground rules emerging from built case studies on adhesive selection and experimental validation. Glass Structures & Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 293-317. ISSN 2363-5142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00178-w

Weller B., Nicklisch F., Prautzsch V., Döbbel F., Rücker S., 2018. All Glass Enclosure with Transparently Bonded Glass Frames. In: Challenging Glass Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, edited by Louter Ch., Bod F., Belis J., TU Delft Open, 10 pp., ISBN 978-90-8570-524-6, https://doi.org/10.7480/cgc.2.2319

Nicklisch F., Weller B., 2016. Adhesive bonding of timber and glass in load-bearing façades - Evaluation of the ageing behaviour. In: WCTE 2016 - World Conference on Timber Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, 8 pp., ISBN 978-390303900-1

Alderucci T., Terlizzi V., Urso S., Borsellino Ch., Munafo P., 2018. Experimental study of the adhesive glass-steel joint behavior in a tensegrity floor. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 85, pp. 293-302. ISSN 0143-7496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.017

Petrie E. M., 2006. Epoxy adhesive formulations, chapter 15, McGraw-Hill, p. 291-341, ISBN 9780071455442

Adams R. D., 2005. Adhesive bonding: science, technology and applications, chapter 6, CRC Press, p. 123-142, ISBN 978-1-85573-741-9

Da Silva L. F. M.; Öchsner A., Adams R. D., 2011. Handbook of adhesion technology, 2. ed., Springer, 1790 pp., ISBN 978-3-642-01168-9

Possart W., Brede M., 2019. Adhesive Joints: Ageing and Durability of Epoxies and Polyurethanes, John Wiley, 526 pp., ISBN 9783527341856

Van Lancker B., Dispersyn J., De Corte W., Belis J., 2016. Durability of adhesive glass-metal connections for structural applications. Engineering Structures, vol. 126, pp. 237-251. ISSN 0141-0296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.024

Sousa J. M., Correia J. R., Cabral-Fonseca S., 2017. Durability of an epoxy adhesive used in civil structural applications. Construction and Building Materials, vol. 161, pp. 618-633. ISSN 0950-0618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.168

ETAG 002: Guideline for European Technical Approval for Structural Sealant Glazing Systems (SSGS). 2013.

EN ISO 9142: Adhesives - Guide to the selection of standard laboratory ageing conditions for testing bonded joints. 2004.

EN ISO 9227: Corrosion tests in artificial atmospheres: salt spray tests. 2023.

EN ISO 4892: Plastics - Methods of exposure to laboratory light sources. 2025.

ASTM D904: Standard Practice for Exposure of Adhesive Specimens to Artificial Light. 2021.

ASTM D1828: Standard Practice for Atmospheric Exposure of Adhesive-Bonded Joints and Structures. 2021.

Assmus E., Popp Ch., Weller B., 2018. Permanent Hydrothermal Exposure on Load-bearing Adhesives in Glass Constructions. In: Challenging Glass Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, edited by Louter Ch., Bod F., Belis J., TU Delft Open, ISBN 978-94-6366-044-0, https://doi.org/10.7480/cgc.6.2154

Kothe Ch., Wünsch J., Weller B., 2022. Discoloration of transparent adhesives for building applications due to aging under solar exposure. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 116. ISSN 0143-7496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103137

Technical data sheet - Araldite 2020, Huntsman Advanced Materials [online]. 2004. Available at: https://products.huntsman.com/products/araldite-2020-1-adhesive

Technical Data Sheet - Loctite AA 3491, Henkel [online]. 2014. Available at: https://datasheets.tdx.henkel.com/LOCTITE-AA-3491-en_GL.pdf

Haldiman M., Luible A., Overend M., 2008. Structural Use of Glass. IABSE. ISBN 978-3-85748-119-2

EN 16612: Glass in building - Determination of the lateral load resistance of glass panes by calculation. 2020.

Vokáč Machalická K., Horčičková I., Eliášová M., 2015. Shear Adhesive Connections for Glass Structures. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 96. ISSN 1757-8981, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/96/1/012069

Campione G., Orlando F., Fileccia G., Pauletta M., 2019. Bond characterization of monolithic and layered glass panels and ultrasonic tests to control glued surfaces. Engineering Structures, Vol. 198. ISSN 0141-0296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109545

Boutar Y., Eliášová M., Tichá P., Zikmundová M., 2023. Assessment of the mechanical behavior of bonded glass-to-glass transparent epoxy adhesive joint at elevated temperatures for load-bearing elements. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 127. ISSN 0143-7496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103526

Machalická K., Eliášová M., 2017. Adhesive joints in glass structures: effects of various materials in the connection, thickness of the adhesive layer, and ageing. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 72, pp. 10-22. ISSN 0143-7496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.09.007

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bonding procedures, artificial ageing and their effect on the durability of glass-to-glass adhesive joints. (2026). Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 35(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2026.01.0006