FIELD LOADING-TEST BASED SHM SYSTEM SAFETY STANDARD DETERMINATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2020.01.0020Keywords:
Structural health monitoring, Continuous rigid frame bridge, field loading test, Bridge rehabilitation, External prestressing, Safety standard thresholdingAbstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) allows for real-time structural response monitoring and online data acquisition of bridge structures. This data reflects the operational and environmental conditions of the bridge, which is important in identification of possible anomalous changes. In order to effortlessly determine the safety condition of the bridge directly through the transferred data without data analysis, a five-level safety standard system will be established for real-time safety warning in this paper. The threshold of each safety levels will be determined through field loading tests results on an external prestressing rehabilitated continuous rigid frame bridge, of which permanent structural health monitoring system was instrumented. After overall evaluation, we come to the conclusion that the rehabilitation is successful and that the bridge is under safe operating condition. A novel, simplified safety standard thresholding technique is proposed based on static loading test results as well as ultimate limit state of the bridge. This technique is simple yet very practical in daily bridge monitoring.
Downloads
References
Cross E., Koo K., Brownjohn J., Worden K., 2013. Long term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge. Mechanical System and Signal Processing, vol. 35: 16 34
Gatti M., 2019. Structural health monitoring of an operational bridge: A case study. Engineering Structures, vol. 195: 200 209,
Maria Giovanna M., Alberto B, Luis F. R., Paulo Amado M., Paulo B. L., 2018. An Overview on Structural Health Monitoring: From the Current State of the Art to New Bio inspired Sensing Paradigms. International Journal of Bio Inspired Computation, vol. 1, issue 1:1
Yonghui A., Eleni C., Sung Han S., Simon L., Bartlomiej B, Jinping O., 2019. Recent progress and future trends on damage identification methods for bridge structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 26:e2416
Moughty J. J., Casas j., 2017. A State of the Art Review of Modal Based Damage Detection in Bridges: Development, Challenges, and Solutions. Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 5
A. Mordini, K. Savov, and H. Wenzel, 2007. The Finite Element Model Updating: A Powerful Tool for Structural Health Monitoring. Structural Engineering International, vol. 17:pp. 352 358
JTG/T J21 01 2015 Load test method for highway bridge, P. s. R. o. C. Ministry of Transportaion of the People’s Republic of China, 2015.
Code for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts JTG D62 2004, 2004. Ministry of Transportation of the People’s Republic of China
Specifications for Design of Highway Steel Bridge JTG D64 2015, 2015. Ministry of Transportation of the People’s Republic of China
AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th ed, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, USA, 2012.
Wong k, Structural health monitoring and safety evaluation of Stonecutters Bridge under the in service condition (Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life Cycle Optimization), 2010. Boca Raton: Crc Press Taylor & Francis Group (in English), pp. 2648 2655.
Schommer S., Nguyen V., Maas S., Zürbes A., 2017. Model updating for structural health monitoring using static and dynamic measurements. Procedia Engineering, vol. 199: 2146 2153
Liu M, Frangopol D, Kim S, 2009. Bridge safety evaluation based on monitored live load effects. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 14, issue 4: 257 269
Zhang W, Shi B, Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhu Y, 2007. The strain field method for structural damage identification using Brillouin optical fiber sensing. Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 16, issue 3: 843 850
Wang X, Hu N, Fukunaga H, Yao Z, 2001.Structural damage identification using static test data and changes in frequencies. Engineering Structures, vol. 23, issue 6: 610 621
Catbas F, Aktan A, 2002. Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices. Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 128, issue 8:1026 1036
Laory I, Hadj Ali N, Trinh T, Smith I, 2012. Measurement system configuration for damage identification of continuously monitored structures. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 17, issue 6: 857 866
Yang Y, Yang J, 2018. State of the Art Review on Modal Identification and Damage Detection of Bridges by Moving Test Vehicles. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 18, issue 2.
Chen X, Zhu H, Chen C, 2005. Structural damage identification using test static data based on grey system theory. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science, vol. 6 A, issue 8: 790 796
Nguyen V, Schommer S, Maas S, Zürbes A, 2016. Static load testing with temperature compensation for structural health monitoring of bridges. Engineering Structures, vol. 127: 700 718
Xu Y, Zhang C, Zhan S, Spencer B, 2018. Multi level damage identification of a bridge structure: a combined numerical and experimental investigation. Engineering Structures, vol. 156: 53 67
Alexandra J R., 2014. Bridge Structural Health Monitoring using Statistical Damage Detection and Advanced Load Rating Methods. Dissertations & Theses Gradworks.
Posenato D., Lanata F., Inaudi D., 2008. Model free data interpretation for continuous monitoring of complex structures. Advanced Engineering Informatics. Vol. 22: 135 144
Feng D., Feng M., 2018. Computer vision for SHM of civil infrastructure: From dynamic response measurement to damage detection A review. Engineering Structures. Vol. 156:105 117.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
