IMPACT OF IMAGE RESOLUTION ON PAVEMENT DISTRESS DETECTION USING PICUCHA METHODOLOGY

Authors

  • Reus Salini Neogennium Technologies, Florianopolis, Brazil
  • Bugao Xu School of Human Ecology, Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  • Mena Souliman University of Texas at Tyler, Department of Civil Engineering, Tyler, Texas 75799, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2016.04.0024

Keywords:

Pavement Engineering, Automatic Distress Detection, PICUCHA Method

Abstract

An accurate and regular survey of the road surface distresses is a key factor for pavement
rehabilitation design and management, allowing public managers to maximize the value of the
continuously limited budgets for road improvements and maintenance. Manual pavement distress
surveys are labor-intensive, expensive and unsafe for highly-trafficked highways. Over the years,
automated surveys using various hardware devices have been developed and improved for
pavement field data collection to solve the problems associated with manual surveys. However,
the reliable distress detection software and the data analysis remain challenging. This study
focused on the analysis of a newly-developed pavement distress classification algorithm, called the
PICture Unsupervised Classification with Human Analysis (PICUCHA) method, particularly the
impact of image resolutions on its classification accuracy. The results show that a non-linear
relationship exists between the classification accuracy and the image resolution, suggesting that
images with a resolution around 1.24 mm/pixel may provide the optimal classification accuracy
when using the PICUCHA method. The findings of this study can help to improve more effective
uses of the specialize software for pavement distress classification, to support decision makers to
choose cameras according to their budgets and desired survey accuracy, and to evaluate how
existing cameras will perform if used with PICUCHA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Koutsopoulos, H.N., Downey, A.B. 1993. Primitive-Based Classification of Pavement Cracking

Images. J. Transp. Eng., 119 (3), p. 402–418.

Lin, J., Liu, Y. 2010. Potholes detection based on SVM in the pavement distress image.

Proc. - 9th Int. Symp. Distrib. Comput. Appl. to Business, Eng. Sci. DCABES 2010, p. 544–547.

Koch, C., Brilakis, I. 2011. Pothole detection in asphalt pavement images. Adv. Eng.

Informatics, 25 (3), p. 507–515.

Koch, C. et al. 2013. Automated Pothole Distress Assessment Using Asphalt Pavement

Video Data. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 27 (4), p. 370–378.

Sun, L., Gu, W. 2011. Pavement Condition Assessment Using Fuzzy Logic Theory and

Analytic Hierarchy Process. J. Transp. Eng., 137 (9), p. 648–655.

Ouyang, A. et al. 2010. Surface Distresses Detection of Pavement Based on Digital Image

Processing. In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Nanchang, China,

p. 368–375.

Tsao, S. et al. 1994. Image-Based Expert-System Approach to Distress Detection on CRC

Pavement. J. Transp. Eng., 120 (1), p. 52–64.

Ho, T. et al. 2010. Pavement distress image recognition using k-means and classification

algorithms. In: Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Proceedings of the International

Conference (Editor: W. Tizani). Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press, p. 73–78.

Rababaah, H. et al. 2005. Asphalt Pavement Crack Classification: A Comparison of GA,

MLP, and SOM. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO’2005) (Editor: F.

Rothlauf). Washington, D.C., USA.

Nguyen, T.S. et al. 2010. Pavement Cracking Detection Using an Anisotropy Measurement.

In: 11ème IASTED International Conference on Computer Graphics and Imaging (CGIM).

Innsbruck, Austria.

¨[11] Puan, O.C. et al. 2007. Automated Pavement Imaging Program (APIP) for Pavement

Cracks Classification and Quantification. Malaysian J. Civ. Eng., 19 (1), p. 1–16.

Tsai, Y. et al. 2010. Critical Assessment of Pavement Distress Segmentation Methods. J.

Transp. Eng., 136 (1), p. 11–19.

Salini, R. et al. 2015. Application of artificial intelligence for optimization in pavement

management. Int. J. Eng. Technol. Innov., 5 (3), p. 189–197.

Salini, R. 2010. INTELLIPave: Uma Abordagem Baseada em Inteligência Artificial para a

Modelagem de Pavimentos Asfálticos. University of Minho.

Salini, R. et al. 2009. INTELLIPave - Considering aside failure criteria and unknown

variables in evolutionary intelligence based models for asphalt pavement. In: Proceedings - 23rd

European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS 2009. Madrid, Spain, p. 624–629.

Salini, R. 2004. Salini Method 2004. Comput. Mech. Proc. Sixth World Congr. Comput.

Mech. Conjunction with Second Asian-Pacific Congr. Comput. Mech., 2, p. 148–155.

Keys, R.G. 1981. Cubic Convolution Interpolation for Digital Image Processing. Trans.

Acoust. Speech, Signal Process., ASSP-29 (6), p. 1153–1160.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

How to Cite

Salini, R., Xu, B., & Souliman, M. (2016). IMPACT OF IMAGE RESOLUTION ON PAVEMENT DISTRESS DETECTION USING PICUCHA METHODOLOGY. Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2016.04.0024

Issue

Section

Articles