GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF LATERITIC SOIL STABILIZED WITH THE ASHES OF OIL PALM FRONDS

Authors

  • Emeka Nnochiri Federal University of Technology, School of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Akure, P.M.B. 704, Nigeria
  • Olufikayo Aderinlewo Federal University of Technology, School of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Akure, P.M.B. 704, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2016.04.0022

Keywords:

Geotechnical, stabilized, Atterberg limits, California bearing ratio, unconfine compressive strength, compaction.

Abstract

This study assesses the geotechnical properties of lateritic soil stabilized with the ashes of
oil palm fronds. These properties are then compared with those of the same soil stabilized with
cement to determine how well the ashes perform since cement is considered to be the best
stabilizer. Laboratory tests such as specific gravity, moisture content, Atterberg limits, particle size
distribution, compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and California bearing ratio
(CBR) tests were first carried out to determine the basic properties of the lateritic soil (without the
stabilizers). Based on the results of these tests, the soil was classified according to AASHTO soil
classification system as an A-7-5 soil which is a poor soil. Hence, the need for stabilization.
Thereafter, strength tests such as California bearing ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength
(UCS) and compaction tests were performed on the soil to which the ashes and cement were
added in percentages of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 by weight of the lateritic soil. The compaction test
showed that the highest maximum dry densities (MDD) were recorded in the case of the oil palm
frond ash (OPFA) and cement at 4% (MDD = 2.02kg/m3) and 6% (MDD = 2.40kg/m3) respectively.
The highest CBR values obtained were 32.6% and 87.32% at 4% OPFA content and 6% cement
content respectively.The unconfined compressive strengths (UCS) of the soil were highest at 4%
OPFA content (234.86kN/m2) and 6% cement content (588.32kN/m2). The chemical tests
performed on the OPFA and the cement showed that the highest oxide component were SiO2
(33.67%) and CaO (60.83%) respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dalvi A.D., Bacon W.G., Osborne R.C., 2004. The Past and the Future of Nickel Laterites. PDAC 2004

International Convention, Trade Show and Investors Exchange. Retrieved 2010.

Ola S.A. Geotechnical Properties and Behaviour of some Nigerian Lateritic Soils. In: Tropical Soils of

Nigeria in Engineering Practice. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema;1978, p. 61-84.

Sherwood P., 1993. Soil Stabilization with Cement and Lime. State of the Art Review. Transport

Research Laboratory HMSO, London.

Amu O.O., Adetuberu A.A., 2010. Characteristics of Bamboo Leaf Ash Stabilization on Lateritic Soil in

Highway Construction. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4: 212-219.

Rogers C.D.F., Glendinnings S., 1993. Modification of Clay Soils using Lime. In: Proceedings of the

Seminar held at Loughborough University on Lime Stabilization,edited by C.A. Rogers, 99-114.

Ingles O.G., Metcalf J.B., 1972. Soil Stabilization: Principles and Practice. Sydney: Butterworths,

p.374.

EuroSoilStab, 2002. Development of Design and Construction Methods to Stabilise Soft Organic Soils:

Design Guide for Soft Soil Stabilization. European Commission, Industrial and Materials Technologies

Programme CT97-0351.

Aribisala O.A., 1989. Sourcing of Local Raw materials and Investment Opportunity in Building/

Construction Industrial Sector. In: Proceedings of the National Workshop held at Central Hotel, Kano,

– 37.

Alhassan M., 2008. Potential of Rice Husk Ash for Soil Stabilization. AU Journal of Technology, vol.

, no. 4: 246-250.

Bello A.A., Ige J.A., Hammed A., 2015. Stabilization of Lateritic Soil with Cassava Peels Ash. British

Journal of Applied Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 6: 642-650.

Amu O.O., Basiru N.T., Coker A.A., 2011. Effects of Forage Ash as Stabilizing Agent in Lateritic Soil

For Road. Innovations in Science and Engineering, vol. 1: 1-8.

Mustapha M.A., 2005. Effect of Bagasse Ash on Cement Stabilized Laterites. Seminar Paper

presented in the Department of Civil Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

Osinubi K. J., 1999. Evaluation of Admixture Stabilization of Nigeria Black Cotton Soil. Nigerian

Society of Engineers Technical Transaction, vol. 34, no. 3: 88-96.

Amu O.O., Faluyi S.O., 2005. Effects of Lime Stabilization and the pH values of Lateritic Soils in Ado-

Ekiti, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 5: 192-194.

British Standard Institution, 1990. Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Properties (BS 1377).

London: British Standard Institution, p.143.

Head K.H., 1992. Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing. Soil Specification and Compaction Tests. 2nd

Edition, vol. 1; London: Pentech Press.

Kadyali L.R., Lal N.B., 2008. Principles and Practices of Highway Engineering. 5th Edition; Delhi:

Khanna Publishers.

Rochigo C.K., Kleber F.P., Mariana O.G.P., Marcelle M.B., 2013. Banana Leaves Ashes as Pozzolans

for Concrete and Mortar of Portland Cement. Construction and Building Materials, vol. 54: 460- 465.

AASHTO, 1991. Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for

Highway Construction Purposes, AASHTO M 145.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

How to Cite

Nnochiri, E., & Aderinlewo, O. (2016). GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF LATERITIC SOIL STABILIZED WITH THE ASHES OF OIL PALM FRONDS. Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2016.04.0022

Issue

Section

Articles