COMPARISON OF TUNNELLING METHODS NATM AND ADECO-RS

Authors

  • Linda Černá Vydrová Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Geotechnics, Thákurova 7, 166 29, Prague 6, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2015.01.0003

Keywords:

NATM, ADECO-RS, tunnelling methods, advance core, deformation response of the rock mass

Abstract

The New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM) has been often used in the Czech
Republic in last two decades. One of the methods, without application in the Czech Republic,
is an Italian method called ADECO-RS, which has reached significant use in Italy and some
other countries. It is the method of controlled deformation, which uses mainly the horizontal
anchoring of the tunnel face to reinforce the area in front of the face (advance core). This
technology is especially important in weak and soft rocks where is necessary to excavate
quickly and smoothly with minimum disruption of initial stress state of the rock mass in the
vicinity of the excavation. The use of NATM can be in some cases uneconomical and
technically inadequately challenging and in such cases would be appropriate to choose
another technology.
Given the facts above, in the Czech environment there is no data available for
comparison of these methods not only in terms of numerical modelling, but also in terms of
feasibility and usability.
The paper summarizes history of the tunnelling methods and it is closer devoted to
NATM and ADECO-RS tunnelling approaches. The basic principles of both methods are set
and further the comparison of these methods is made on a theoretical level.
The paper hereinafter includes the analysis of fibreglass face anchors application
during the construction of three-aisled Veleslavín Station and the impact assessment of tunnel
face anchoring during the excavation of ventilation tunnel on the newly built part of the Prague
Metro „V.A“.
The paper also deals with practical knowledge gained during the technical visit of Italian
Val di Sambro Tunnel which is built according to ADECO-RS approach. These findings are
essential for the correct interpretation of Lunardi method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kolymbas, D., Tunneling and Tunnel Mechanics, Berlin: Springer, 2005.

Gajdoš, P., Šťovíček, J. Geological Monitoring During the Construction of Two Tunnels in the North

of Iceland. Tunel. Vol. 17 No. 2/2008, pp. 45-50.

Robins, P.J. and Austin, S.A. Sprayed Concrete: Properties, Design and Application. Caithness :

Whittles Publishing, 1995.

Lunardi, P. The design and construction of tunnels using the approach based on the analysis of

controlled deformation in rocks and soils. 2000, Tunnels and Tunneling, pp. 3-30. Available from:

http://geotecnica.dicea.unifi.it/adeco.pdf

Lunardi, Pietro. Design and construction of tunnels. Berlin: Springer, 2008.

Lunardi, P. and Bindi, R. The evolution of reinforcement of the advance core using fibre-glass

elements, Felsbau 22, pp 8-19, 2004.

Balušík, P. and Mařík, L. Comparison of NATM and ADECO-RS methods, using Monte Cuneo

tunnel, Italy, as an example. Tunel. Vol. 18 No. 1/2009, pp. 43-50.

Downloads

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

Vydrová, L. Černá. (2015). COMPARISON OF TUNNELLING METHODS NATM AND ADECO-RS. Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2015.01.0003

Issue

Section

Articles