A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN PERSONAL AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF HERITAGE SITES

Authors

  • Arli Llabani Faculty of Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University of Tirana
  • Freskida Abazaj Faculty of Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University of Tirana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2024.02.0014

Keywords:

PLS, TLS, Point cloud, Accuracy, Bashtova castle, viDOC

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of mobile and terrestrial laser scanning techniques in the 3D surveying of Bashtova castle in Albania, showcasing the integration's efficacy in capturing a comprehensive and accurate representation of this historical structure. Personal laser scanning (PLS), characterized by its mobility and ability to capture data while in motion, offers advantages in terms of efficiency and coverage of large areas. Conversely, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), with its stationary setup and high precision, excels in capturing detailed information and intricate architectural features. Thanks to the research on the case study of the Bastova Castle in the article, it can be stated that the integration of data from PLS and TLS is seamless with the help of modern software while respecting the basic photogrammetric-geodetic rules and demonstrates the possibility of creating a complex 3D model, usable for further analyses for architects and conservation professionals, as well as for restorers and civil engineers. Research has shown that the difference between point clouds from PLS and TLS is within one centimeter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Uysal M, Toprak A.S, Polat, N (2015) DEM Generation with UAV Photogrammetry and Accuracy Analysis in Sahitler Hill. Measurement, 73, 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.010

Balázsik V, Tóth Z, Abdurahmanov I (2021) Analysis of Data Acquisition Accuracy with UAV. International Journal of Geoinformatics, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p1-10. 10p. https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v17i1.1697

Mulakala J (2019) Measurement Accuracy of the DJI Phantom 4 RTK & Photogrammetry. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1123/1/012015/pdf

Przybilla H.J, Baeumker M (2020) RTK and PPK: GNSS-Technologies for Direct Georeferencing of UAV Image Flights. In Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2020, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341312887_RTK_and_PPK_GNSS-Technologies_for_direct_georeferencing_of_UAV_image_flights

Akgul M, Yurtseven H, Gulci S, Akay A.E (2018) Evaluation of UAV and GNSS-Based DEMs for Earthwork Volume. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 43, 1893–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2811-9

Mohammadi M, Rashidi M, Mousavi V, Karami A, Yu Y, Samali B (2021) Quality evaluation of digital twins generated based on UAV photogrammetry and TLS: bridge case study. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173499

Guo M, Sun M, Pan D, Wang G, Zhou Y, Yan B, Fu Z (2023) High-precision deformation analysis of yingxian wooden pagoda based on UAV image and terrestrial LiDAR point cloud. Herit Sci.;11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00833-z

Remondino F (2011) Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sens.;3(6):1104–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3061104

Logothetis S, Delinasiou A, Stylianidis E (2015) Building information modelling for cultural heritage: a review. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci.; II-5/W3:177–83. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W3-177-2015

Yastikli N (2007) Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. J Cult Herit.;8(4):423–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.06.003

Moon D, Chung S, Kwon S, Seo J, Shin J (2019) Comparison and utilization of point cloud generated from photogrammetry and laser scanning: 3D world model for smart heavy equipment planning. Autom Constr.; 98:322–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.020

Kwoczynska B, Piech I, Polewany P, Gora K (2018) Modeling of sacral objects made on the basis of aerial and terrestrial laser scanning. In: 2018 Baltic geodetic congress (BGC Geomatics) p. 275–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/BGC-Geomatics.2018.00059

Hassan, A.T.; Fritsch, D. Integration of Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry in 3D/4D Cultural Heritage Preservation—A Review. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 16. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijast.v9n4p9

Albertz, J. A Look Back: 140 Years of Photogrammetry. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2007, 73, 504–506.

Aicardi, I.; Chiabrando, F.; Lingua, A.M.; Noardo, F. Recent trends in cultural heritage 3D survey: The photogrammetric computer vision approach. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 32, 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.006

Erdelyi, J.; Kopacik, A.; Kyrinovic, P. Construction control and documentation of facade elements using terrestrial laser scanning. Appl. Geomat. 2018, 10, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0208-4

Wang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, L.; Liu, L.; Zheng, L. A Survey of Mobile Laser Scanning Applications and Key Techniques over Urban Areas. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131540

Haala, N.; Alshawabkeh, Y. Combining Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry—A Hybrid Approach for Heritage Documentation, Proceedings of the 7th International conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage VAST’06, Nicosia, Cyprus, 30 October–4 November2006; Ioannides, M., Arnold, D., Niccolucci, F., Mania, K., Eds.; Eurographics Association: Goslar, Germany, 2006; pp. 163–170. https://doi.org/10.2312/VAST/VAST06/163-170

Jaafar, H.A.; Meng, X.; Sowter, A.; Bryan, P. New approach for monitoring historic and heritage buildings: Using terrestrial laser scanning and generalised Procrustes analysis. Struct. Control. Heal. Monit. 2017, 24, e1987. https://doi.org 10.1002/stc.1987

Pritchard, D.; Sperner, J.; Hoepner, S.; Tenschert, R. Terrestrial laser scanning for heritage conservation: The Cologne Cathedral documentation project. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, 2, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W2-213-2017

Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P.; Jiménez Fernández-Palacios, B.; Muñoz-Nieto, Á.L.; Arias-Sanchez, P.; Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. Mobile LiDAR System: New Possibilities for the Documentation and Dissemination of Large Cultural Heritage Sites. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 189

https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030189

Pavelka, K.; Šedina, J.; Pavelka, K., Jr. Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754

Bouček, T.; Stará, L.; Pavelka, K.; Pavelka, K., Jr. Monitoring of the Rehabilitation of the Historic World War II US Air Force Base in Greenland. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174323

Pavelka, K.; Šedina, J.; Pavelka, K., Jr. Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754

Matoušková, E.; Pavelka, K.; Smolík, T.; Pavelka, K., Jr. Earthen Jewish Architecture of Southern Morocco: Documentation of Unfired Brick Synagogues and Mellahs in the Drâa-Tafilalet Region. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1712. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041712

Pix4D, Pix4Dmapper 4.1 User Manual. Lausanne, 2020

Faro Technologies, Faro Scene User Manual. Florida, 2023

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN PERSONAL AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF HERITAGE SITES. (2024). Stavební Obzor - Civil Engineering Journal, 33(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2024.02.0014