EVALUATION ON COMPREHENSIVE BENEFIT OF LARGE SCALED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BASED ON FUZZY THEORY: A CASE STUDY OF GUANGZHOU IN CHINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2019.01.0005Keywords:
Comprehensive benefit; Large scaled c onstruction project ; Index Fuzzy synthetic evaluation Construction management Case studyAbstract
With the implementation of “The Belt and Road” policy and increasing investment, there will
be a large number of large scaled construction projects (LSCP) in China. However, the
comprehensive benefit of most LSCP is not satisfactory because of concerning more about the
economic benefits. It makes the sustainability of LSCP concerned about. In order to ensure the
sustainabl e development, the evaluation of the comprehensive benefit of LSCP should be
carried out. Based on comprehensive literature review and content analysis, 30 influence factors
of comprehensive benefit evaluation for LSCP are identified. The evaluation index system of 17
factors containing three subsystems of social, economic and environmental benefit is
established through factor analysis. Entropy method is used to determine weights of each
indicator, and then synthetic evaluation model is put up. This paper selects a practical case,
Lieder Village reconstruction in Guangzhou, to calculate the synthetic evaluation value using
fuzzy theory. The evaluation results are satisfactory and in line with reality. It shows that the
evaluation index system and synthetic evaluation model has a certain reference value for
analysis of comprehensive benefit and can help for enhancing the construction and
management level of LSCP and promoting the sustainable development of LSCP.
Downloads
References
Alcamo J., Bennett E.M., 2003. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: A frame work for assessment.
Physics Teacher, 34 (9), 534 534.
Bromley R.D.F., Thomas C.J., Tallon A.R., 2005. C ity centre regeneration through residential
development: Contributing to sustainability . U rban Studies, 42 (13), 2407 2429.
Shen L.Y., Ochoa, J.J., Shah, M.N., Zhang, X.L., 2011. The application of urban sustainability
indicators A comparison between various practices . Habitat International, 35 (1), 17 29.
Ebdon C., Landow P., 2012. The Balancing Act: Using Private Money for Public Proj ects . Public
Budgeting & Finance, 32 (1), 58 79
Lizarralde G., Root D., 2008. The infor mal construction sector and the inefficiency of low cost
housing markets . Construction Management & Economics, 26 (2), 103 113.
Pheng L.S., Chuan Q.T., 2006. Environmental factors and work performance of project
managers in th e construction industry . International Journal of Project Management, 24 (1), 24 37.
Gundes S., 2011. Exploring the dynamics of the Turkish construction industry using input output
analysis. Construction Management & Economics, 29 (1), 59 68.
] Tam V.W.Y., Tam C.M., 2006. Evaluations of existing waste recycling methods: A Hong Kong
study . Building & Environment, 41(12), 1649 1660.
] Wang W., Zhao G.J., Bi X., 2008. Sustainability Assessment System of Engineering Proje ct.
Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), 10(2),122 125.
] Abidin N.Z., 2010. Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction
concept by
Malaysian developers
Habitat International, 34 (4), 4 21 426.
] Tang T., 2011. The benefit analysis of the villages’ reconstruction in Guangzhou City. M. Thesis,
South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China 58 64
] Catalina T., 2012. Local experiences of urban sustainability: Researching H ousing Market
Renewal interventions in three English neighborhoods. Progress in Planning, 78, 101 150.
] Peng Y., Lai Y., Li X., Zhang X., 2015. An alternative model for m easuring the sustainability of
urban regeneration: the way forward . Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 76 83.
] Xia B., Chen Q., Skitmore M., Zuo J., Li M., 2015. Comparison of sustainable community rating
tools in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Prod uction, 109, 84 91.
] Hemphill L., McGreal S., Berry J., 2002. An aggregated weighting system for evaluating
sustainable urban regeneration. Property Research , 19 (4), 353 373.
] Tam V.W., Tam C., Zeng S., Chan K., 2006. Environmental performance measurement
indicators in construction. Building and Environment,41(2): 164 173.
] L ee G.K.L., Chan E.H.W., 2008. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for
Assessment of Urban Renewal Proposals. Social Indicators Research, 89 (1), 155 168.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
